Evolutionism claims to be an operation science, although it doesn’t have any scientific proof for its conclusions concerning origins and it contradicts all the basic and most important laws and principles of science. Actually, we thank God that the evolutionist scientists are not applying their false evolutionist assumptions to all of their other researches, or else we would not have any development in science. Actually, evolutionism is anti-science.
Let’s see together some basic and important laws and principles that are clearly contradicted by evolutionism:
The laws of thermodynamics
The first law of thermodynamics says that the actual amount of energy in the universe remains constant; it doesn’t change. The second law of thermodynamics says that the amount of usable energy in the universe is decreasing. Everything is tending toward disorder. Now, if the overall amount of energy stays the same, but we are running out of usable energy, then what we started with was not an infinite amount. You can’t run out of an infinite amount. If you have an infinite amount of money, then you can’t spend them all. You can’t run out of money in that case. This means that the universe is finite, and not eternal. It could not have existed forever in the past and will not exist forever into the future.
Brief, the universe is CREATED. It came from NOTHING, with a finite amount of energy. As soon as you say “creation”, then you say “no evolution”, because ALL what evolution is based on assumes that there was no creation. For example, if evolution will date a tree from the first days of creation, it will give a wrong date, because when it uses any tool of measuring it first assumes that the tree was not created. Thus it gets a wrong age for the earth through that tree, because the tree was just created, and yet it is a grown up tree that evolution will date as being hundreds of years old. All the assumptions of evolution fall if there is creation. If there is creation, then everything was NOT happening in the past the same way it is now, at least it was not happening the same way before creation. If there is creation, then there is the Creator who created, and what He says about how He created is true, and not the assumptions of the evolutionists who don’t have any eyewitness.
That was one of the laws of science (actually 2, if we also take the first law of thermodynamics) that evolutionism contradicts.
Evolutionism doesn’t have any scientific proof. It contradicts the laws of science. So it needs to prove itself scientific BEFORE beginning its studies and its claims. While all what it does is to assume that there was no creation BEFORE beginning its studies, and reaches to the conclusion that there was no creation… Very scientific, right?
For additional facts about these laws of thermodynamics go to the following pages: The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Second law of thermodynamics – Does this basic law of nature prevent evolution?, Thermodynamics vs. Evolutionism.
The principle of causality
This is the principle of cause and effect upon which all modern science is built. Everything in this universe, everything that has a beginning, has a cause.
As we have seen, the laws of thermodynamics say that this universe had a beginning, because it is not eternal. It is finite. As the evolutionists can’t defend their dream that this universe is eternal, because it contradicts the laws of thermodynamics, so they pass to another option. They think: “Why not say that the universe came all alone from nothing!”
Here is what they call science!! “Let’s speculate and imagine things!”
Anyways… saying that this universe came from nothing all alone clearly contradicts the very important scientific principle of causality, and it is NOT operation science. This is just a belief, and you need a very strong blind faith to believe in this, because it contradicts science and experience.
And they still call evolutionism science… In that case, the ancient Greeks had a better science than our modern science… They didn’t have the principle of causality in their pseudo-science, just like the evolutionists when talking about origins…
Pasteur’s work showed that there is nothing called spontaneous generation. And all the scientific findings prove that spontaneous generation is only a wrong ancient belief of the ancient Greeks. But, despite all this, spontaneous generation is an essential part of the theory of evolution. Despite all the efforts of evolutionary scientists, not one observable case of spontaneous generation has ever been found. Pasteur’s findings conflicted with the idea of spontaneous generation (as do all scientific results since).
This was another scientific fact that evolutionism contradicts. And yet, evolutionists say that evolution is science! Although evolutionism has ZERO scientific proof, and it clearly contradicts the laws of science and the scientific facts, as we have seen.
Don’t forget to visit this important website: Answers in Genesis.
And this one: Institute for Creation Research.